January 22, 2012
Author: Matthew Grasso

Killings on the Mexican border have surpassed the number of civilian deaths reported throughout the entire nation of Afghanistan last year. Chihuahua, which borders Texas and New Mexico, reported 2,276 deaths from drug related violence for the period January - September 2011. During the same period the U.S. led war effort in Afghanistan caused 2,177 civilian deaths, according to a Congressional Research Service report.

Since toughening his rhetoric and policy initiatives in the past 5-6 years, President Felipe Calderón presided over a country which saw 47,515 drug-related killings in 5 years (December 2006-2011), violence escalating as police and military took to the streets of Mexico in an effort to 'crack down' on drug gangs. Unfortunately, this is likely all they can do, and simply adopting heavy-handed tactics almost never works (remember drug trade has not slowed and violence has increased). One of the main roots of this misery is the drug policy of the U.S. government. The draconian set of laws which apply to drug crimes have filled our own prison system to capacity, but the same set of laws also spread violence and corruption beyond American borders.

The massive amounts of money flowing with the drug trade allow these organizations to be as violent, expansive and effective as they are. They give criminal organizations the resources to corrupt and bribe law enforcement officials, politicians, policy makers, etc., and to recover from almost any seizure or other successful law enforcement action. As the cartels can afford military-grade weapons with their massive profits, "war" is an appropriate term for the situation in the U.S./Mexico border region.

Activities like drug use cannot be legislated and/or enforced out of existence. Our own prohibition of alcohol proved disastrous and brought about a dynamic of criminal cartels competing for significant swaths of the country, a situation similar to what Mexico is currently experiencing. Redefining the issue as one of public health would not only severely reduce the burden on prison systems around this country, it would attack the root of the problem instead of the simply reacting to the symptoms as they manifest. The eventual result would be a decrease in profitability and therefore a less prolific criminal element south of the U.S. border. The approach would benefit many; we need only the collective resolve to question long-standing policy.


http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/47515-drug-war-murders-mexico-just-5-years


 

Comments

Matt can you find out if drug related crimes increased or decreased after Nixon initiated the "war on drugs"? And Trainspotting is a good movie, but it also sounds like someone has taken reefer maddness seriously.
Wednesday, September 05, 2012 06:37 PM
72vP2X <a href="http://lxxamkuwulyk.com/">lxxamkuwulyk</a>
Monday, April 30, 2012 10:24 AM
ZS5uyu , [url=http://qayxkjjzpvtz.com/]qayxkjjzpvtz[/url], [link=http://tupklregqcbk.com/]tupklregqcbk[/link], http://afsoahujqcih.com/
Monday, April 30, 2012 04:16 AM
IV736N <a href="http://lkfcaxjklcdx.com/">lkfcaxjklcdx</a>
Sunday, April 29, 2012 04:32 AM
@SimonActually according to my grdhnfataer there were lots of addicts when those were over-the-counter drugs, especially just after WWII.Everybody hated them because the chances of talking with anyone of them was minute. They scolded you, acted like "victims" to plead for your money$, or, worse, attacked you.Stories about these people were avoided (though you will find stories about "famous" people finding their end that way, or ironic endings, such as the daughter of the director of an alcohol bottling plant dieing from mixing cocaine and alcohol, that sort of stuff). Contact with people like this was massively avoided (for good reason).You see, it doesn't matter to those 10% how cheap drugs are. There are never enough. They're never cheap enough, and they will do anything, anything at all to get them (a fact that was frequently exploited by criminals even when drugs were legal).Have you ever seen an addict ? Trust me if the drug war actually encouraged addiction, even just a bit, like you keep claiming, people would be arming themselves regardless of the government's opinion on the matter. And they would take some serious firepower.Please take a look around you, if you can't visit an actual clinic, at least watch a movie like "trainspotting", and take a look at what drugs do to people.Also I find your reasoning flawed "people do it (drugs) anyway, so we should allow it", after all, the very same argument is perfectly applicable to murder.
Sunday, April 29, 2012 01:47 AM
Good stuff! Props for calling attention to the troubles in Mexico caused by modern American drug prohibition. I've always said, the best thing Al Capone ever had was prohibition. ~don salvatore
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:27 PM

Add a Comment

Comments:



Please confirm the characters in the above image: